M87Decision systems for consequential work

Independent diagnostic advisory · AI, automation + visibility

Find the constraint before you fund the solution.

M87 identifies the governing constraint, establishes what would count as proof, and returns the smallest defensible next decision.

SCROLL TO SEPARATE THE FIELD

Diagnosis before implementationEvidence before claimsHuman authorization at every consequential gate

Begin where the uncertainty is visible.

Both offers are governed by the M87 Constraint-to-Value Protocol. Neither includes implementation by default.

Primary diagnostic01

M87 Constraint Review

For leaders considering AI, automation, process change, or a stalled initiative.

  • What is actually governing the outcome?
  • What evidence would support or reject that finding?
  • Should you stop, measure, repair, evaluate, or pilot?
Inspect the Constraint Review →
Visibility wedge02

M87 Visibility Diagnostic

For firms that may be absent or displaced in AI-mediated buying decisions.

  • Are you visible when a real buyer asks AI who to hire?
  • Who occupies the answer space instead?
  • Which evidence gap most likely explains the displacement?
Inspect the Visibility Diagnostic →

A decision method with explicit gates.

The protocol keeps observation, diagnosis, proof, value, and authorization from collapsing into a sales pitch.

01 · Outcome

Name the decision

Define the business result, accountable owner, affected workflow, deadline, and materiality.

02 · Constraint

Test explanations

Map where value first stops and test the lead constraint against credible alternatives.

03 · Proof

Contract the evidence

Fix the baseline, outcome, indicators, guardrails, source of record, and attribution rule.

04 · Decision

Authorize the next move

Stop, measure, repair, evaluate, or run the smallest bounded intervention worth funding.

Every material claim declares what it is.

Confidence is not evidence. M87 marks the basis of each material statement and preserves uncertainty when the record does not support a stronger conclusion.

Observed

Directly inspected or reproduced by M87.

Reported

Supplied by a stakeholder and not independently verified.

Calculated

Derived from cited inputs with visible arithmetic.

Inferred

A reasoned conclusion from explicitly stated evidence.

Unknown

A material fact that has not yet been established.

What leaves the room with you.

The engagement produces an inspectable decision record, whether the right answer is to build, repair, measure, defer, or stop.

01

Constraint Brief

What governs the result, what competes with it, and what remains unknown.

02

Measurement Contract

The baseline, outcome, guardrails, source of record, and attribution rule.

03

Decision Options

The credible paths from no action through a bounded pilot.

04

Value Range

Conservative, expected, and upside cases with assumptions exposed.

05

Decision Packet

The recommendation, decision gate, and explicit authorization boundary.

The diagnostic can conclude “do not proceed.”

Corrective work, implementation, and recurring service require a separate scope and explicit authorization.

No predetermined build

AI is one possible intervention—not the premise of the engagement.

No fictional value

Time savings, revenue, and risk reduction require a defensible realization or attribution basis.

No implied authority

M87 does not access systems, contact outsiders, or change records without named authorization.

Operator judgment, made inspectable.

M87 Studio is an independent decision-systems practice led by Mac McFall. It works at the point where strategy, operations, evidence, AI, automation, and accountable execution meet.

The work is designed for leaders who need a defensible decision before a vendor, platform, or implementation path becomes the answer by default.

Start with the decision—not the tool.

Submit a short fit intake. M87 will determine whether the problem is diagnosable and material, then accept, narrow, defer, or decline the review.